Malware Fighter caught 67 percent, in each case asking whether to remove the threat, leave it but deny access, or whitelist it. Kaspersky, for example, quickly wiped out 80 percent of the samples on sight. In most products, the tiny file access required to display each sample in Windows Explorer is enough to trigger a real-time protection scan. I start my malware protection test by opening a folder containing that collection of malware samples. The results don't look good for Malware Fighter. For comparison, I retested all our Editors' Choice antivirus products, both free and commercial, on the updated testbed configuration. With no other products tested on this exact set of samples, interpreting Malware Fighter's results would have been tough. This time around I had the additional challenge of upgrading all my virtual machines from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 and revamping the code in some of my tools to account for differences in the operating system. The main difference is that I can only refresh my malware collection once a year, because doing so takes so much time away from reviews. Me, I don't have a staff, but I do test using real-world malware and my own hand-coded analysis tools. The independent labs employ large staffs of expert analysts for their tests. With no results from the labs for Malware Fighter, my own hands-on tests are my only measure of its efficacy. As noted, all four included Kaspersky, and with 9.9 points it's close to perfect. Bitdefender Antivirus Plus ($26 at Bitdefender) currently has a perfect 10, based on tests by three labs. I've created an algorithm that maps all four onto a 10-point scale to produce an aggregate score. Malware Fighter, by contrast, appears in none of the lab tests.Įach of the four labs uses a different scoring method. ![]() All four include Symantec Norton AntiVirus Plus, Kaspersky, McAfee, Trend Micro, and a few others. I follow tests from four labs: AV-Test, AV-Comparatives, MRG-Effitas, and SE Labs. If a product shows up in a test report, it means the lab felt it was worth evaluating, and the company felt it was worth paying to participate. Getting good scores in independent lab tests is important, but so is simply appearing in the lab reports. ![]() This time around, the collection includes the Dashlane password manager and a backup utility from Aomei, along with a half-dozen IObit products. Most from IObit, but some are from other vendors. Note that the last menu item, titled Action Center, is just an upsell page encouraging you to install other products. Note that for Edge you must install the extension from the Store. Next, open the Browser Protect tab and enable Surfing Protection & Ads Removal in each browser you use. First, turn on the Bitdefender engine, which requires a reboot. And a bar at the bottom shows you the status of the three protection engines, IObit's antivirus and ransomware protection engines, and an engine licensed from Bitdefender.Ī couple of important features aren't enabled by default you need to fix that. At the left is a vertical menu that just shows icons, sliding out full labels when you point to it. An animated status indicator dominates the middle, with a big Scan button below. ![]() The product's main window uses a charcoal gray background with minty green buttons. Given the poor performance of the commercial edition, I saw no reason to look at the less capable free version. Just about every significant feature beyond the basic antivirus engine comes only in the Pro edition. IObit does offer a free version of Malware Fighter, but it's extremely limited. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |